Commons:Valued image candidates/St Patrick's Cathedral (Gothic Revival Style).jpg

St Patrick's Cathedral (Gothic Revival Style).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Donaldytong (talk) on 2013-01-29 13:21 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne (Southwest Facade)
Used in	Global usage
Reason	Facades of Gothic Revival Style - St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne -- Donaldytong (talk)
Review (criteria)	Comment Certainly the best image for this facade, but I'm not sure it's the best for the entire cathedral. cmadler (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment I agree. For example, File:St Patrick's Cathedral - Gothic Revival Style.jpg may be more valued. ---Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)  Done changed Template:VISC to Template:VIC. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment It is sufficient to add: facade in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for all your review and comments for this valued image nominated. I changed this nomination image to the category of Facades. As per Walter Siegmund suggested, the image of File:St Patrick's Cathedral - Gothic Revival Style.jpg is inserted below for valued image nomination in the scope of St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne. Donaldytong (talk) 12:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC) "Facades" is certainly too broad a scope. The suggested scope would be for this facade (e.g., "St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne (facade)" or "St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne (southwest facade)"). cmadler (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Yes that's what I meant. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)  Done I agree with Archaeodontosaurus and cmadler suggestions and changed the scope to St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne (Southwest Facade). Donaldytong (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)  Support new scope (as corrected). --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2013 (UTC)  Support Meets all criteria in new scope. cmadler (talk) 21:29, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)