Commons:Valued image candidates/Scuola Grande dei Carmini - Sala dell'Archivio - La Vergine appare al profeta Elia sul monte Carmelo - Giustino Menescardi.jpg
Comment - It's disturbing and probably debilitating to this nomination that the painting is cut on all sides in this photo. Would it be possible to include its entirety in a single photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Single image without reconstruction, only parts of the frame have been removed. The frame is exceptional; look at the photograph of the room (here) the frame exceeds 50cm thick and the part closest to us is blurred from where the clipping. The shadows of the frame in this context are particularly visible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I understand the challenge, but it's quite clear, for example, that the upper right parts of the plant are in the photo you linked and not in this one. Perhaps for a good VI, it may be necessary to stack a number of photos. However, I feel the need to oppose this one for the reason I stated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: There is a misunderstanding. There is a painting on the ceiling with lamps that illuminate, the frame generates shadows, Here is the picture that shows the canvas. That's all there is no manipulation neither done nor to be done, it is reality of what we see. If you have arguments to oppose it you have to detail them because I do not understand.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I am in no way accusing you of manipulating anything. My point is quite a straightforward one: That in this photo, parts of the painting are not visible. And as an example, I cite the fact the the entire tree on the right side of the picture frame is showing in the other photo you linked, but not in this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Do not worry, nothing is missing from the canvas. I saved the RAW I can send you a low resolution jpeg rush. Give me an Email with your address. You will also understand the problem of the frame. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What would I do with the RAW? I do understand the problem with the frame. As I said, it probably makes a stitched multi-image photo of this painting necessary for us to see all of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at the two pictures again, now at full size, and have lifted my opposing vote. This still doesn't look like an entire painting, but I haven't seen it in person. I have to say, the shape of the painting in the other photo sure looks different from this, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
