Commons:Valued image candidates/Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673.jpg

Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	NormanB (talk) on 2009-09-15 12:19 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment Even if the scope was acceptable (perhaps too narrow), File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg would be a strong competitor. --Myrabella (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)  Question Would 'Stairs in the Vatican Museums' be a better scope?. -- NormanB (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment In fact, VI rules for buildings scopes don't offer so much possibilities for buildings - or parts of building. They say: "The building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope". But they precise: "Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest". I think one can consider it's the case here. So let's keep the original scope. Within this scope, File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg is better, IMO. Note: There is another spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums, the Bramante's one. It looks like that. I wasn't able to find any image of it in Commons (but I found some false attributions, e.g. in :fr:w...), . If you had a picture of it in your collection, it would be very valuable. --Myrabella (talk) 06:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC) I wish I had a picture of Bramantes stairs! I also noticed the lack of pictures of it on Commons. --NormanB (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Fails criterion 1 (“Is the most valuable illustration of its kind on Wikimedia Commons”) IMO, see comment above.--Myrabella (talk) 06:57, 17 September 2009 (UTC)  Question Can you indicate why you feel that File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg is better? IMO the technical quality of File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg is less. Do you agree? If so, it is the composition that makes it better? -- NormanB (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Info On request I have uploaded an alternative version, which is more cropped. -- NormanB (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment Please set up an MVR. Lycaon (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Info MVR set-up as requested. -- NormanB (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Request May you add the third image in competition, File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg? Thanks, --Myrabella (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Comment Already  Done. -- H005 (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Oppose Both other proposals are superior IMHO, although it's hard to say which of the other two is best. -- H005 (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Scores: 1. Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673.jpg: -2 2. Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673 v2 cropped.jpg: 0 3. VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg: +3 => File:Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673.jpg: Declined. File:Rome - Vatican Museum - Spiral Staircase by Giuseppe Momo - 0673 v2 cropped.jpg: Declined. File:VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 08:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)