Commons:Valued image candidates/Margaret McDermott Bridge.jpg

Margaret McDermott Bridge.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Fkbowen (talk) on 2020-03-22 01:27 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Margaret McDermott Bridge in Dallas
Used in	Global usage en:Margaret McDermott Bridge en:Interstate 30
Review (criteria)	The link is misleading. You should create Category:Margaret McDermott Bridge and populate with relevant photos. Buidhe (talk) 03:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Comment More simply you find the category adapted to your image, you place the image inside and you modify your scope. Look at the changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Support good now--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC) This is a different bridge than Trinity River Bridge. The scope is now definitely wrong. Buidhe (talk) 07:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) @Buidhe: Your idea of making a category is good but it is complicated for a novice. We can therefore build a coherent scope which is connected to a category which contains the image. All the other bridges that cross the Trinity river in Dallas can label on the same principle. And in the future each bridge can have its category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC) Except that Category:Trinity River Bridge doesn't refer to all bridges across the Trinity River, just a specific one built in 1930 and called "Trinity River Bridge". Buidhe (talk) 07:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Question - Buidhe, why don't you either oppose or create a new gallery and fix the link in the scope? I agree with you and would oppose, but I feel weird opposing while you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Oppose I am going to oppose, since the scope is just wrong right now. To me, at least, it seems that Margaret McDermott Bridge is relatively well-known to Americans in general, so I'm not sure why it doesn't already have its own category. But I'm not making one, the nominator should take care of that. All of this scope-related drama recently makes me think we should have some kind of seminar for people who regularly nominate here on how to make correct scopes. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Oppose - OK, I'll oppose, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Comment —Percival Kestreltail, I also agree with your remark, and as part of the discussion, it may be necessary to finally codify practices that have been done for years just by custom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Sorry, I just understood my error. The category is created. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Comment Can the scope link directly to the correct category? Right now it links to the Trinity River Bridge category. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Comment The scope must point to the category that contains the image ... (Well done, thank you ) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)  Support - Thank you! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good now. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)