Commons:Valued image candidates/Bomen hebben het moeilijk in het winderige klimaat op de voormalige zeebodem. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen.jpg

Bomen hebben het moeilijk in het winderige klimaat op de voormalige zeebodem. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen.jpg

undecided

Image
Nominated by	Famberhorst (talk) on 2020-06-10 17:32 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Dead tree in the Oostvaardersplassen
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Comment I doubt this is a useful scope. Why do you think it's a useful scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Answer: trees are struggling at the bottom of the former IJsselmeer. That shows this picture well. But you may think otherwise. Then I would like to hear it.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC) I see. So the idea is to make an ecological point, not merely to show a dead tree that happens to be there. Because there are dead trees everywhere that trees grow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Don't close this nomination yet. I'm waiting for another reply from Famberhorst. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Answer; Sorry for the misunderstanding, I misunderstood. I thought it was your observation. I think this tree shows how (extreme living conditions) influence the (bizarre) growth of a tree.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC) OK, two other requests: (1) Please remove the Wikipedia link and (2) please indicate which other photos are in scope, because there's no way I'll be able to pick them out from Category:Dead trees in the Netherlands. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC) *Answer Thank you very much for your response. The link Q2909080 was not created by me. This link is used by several pages. I decided to withdraw this nomination. Thanks again for the effort you have made. and the work that I have given you. I hope you don't mind.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)  Question Why withdraw the nomination? I think you've explained why it's a useful scope; I just want to be able to judge the photo effectively within the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC) Answer: I cannot figure out how to do that. (That is my inability).--Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC) I understand. I'd have to say, if you can't be sure which dead trees in the category are in scope, maybe it's right for there not to be a VI in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 0 oppose => undecided. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)