Comment Yeah, you might want to slow down with these. It is emotionally difficult for some of us (including me), in spite of our views on the importance of sharing knowledge. So maybe wait a few days in between these kinds of nominations, if that's OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is important is our discussion, which allows us to express ourselves. Silence is complicity. Evil can only progress in the shadows; it needs to be brought to light. In 50 years this image will be a small piece of history. This says Charles rightly I can speak without voting! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best in scope. This man may be a footnote to history, but he's not necessarily less important than the Ukrainians who were important Nazi collaborators, and their existence and depredations are still historically important. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That said, I think I am going to ignore the nominations of these collaborationist politicians for a while, because we are being absolutely deluged with these nominations. Butko, why don't you nominate photos of the Russian generals who have been killed in action by Ukrainian forces? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
