Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:1928 Model A Ford.jpg

File:1928 Model A Ford.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2009 at 14:31:05

•  Info unimpressive quality, bad resolution, blown white on tires, can't read the text on the table which seems to be big enough to be caught on camera without problem, strange tight composition (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- Avala (talk) 14:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Do you mean the sign which says "Greater Vancouver Regional District, Crippen Regional Park, Union Steamship Company Store, ?Chamber of Commerce, INFO CENTRE", or the street sign that says "Bowen Island Trunk Rd, Cardena Dr"? or the plaque on the side of the library that says ... ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 00:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

If I knew what it says it would have been readable, however you can't avoid the fact that the text is almost impossible to read (Regional could easily be Belgemal). Any strain at reading the text that big on a photo is a good enough signal that the photo is of poor quality.--Avala (talk) 09:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Well I've never been there or even heard of the place before, so did no know what it said :-). If you have to squint at a sign in the background to decide whether the quality is any good, then I would say there is actually nothing wrong with the quality - the picture is of the car, not the background :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Weak delist I was very close to voting to keep this one, as it is clearly the best delisting candidate I've seen, but then of course this would never get promoted today, so it has to go. -- JovanCormac 14:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Not so bad for year 2004. --Karel (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Do we have some kind of amnesty for poor quality photos because they were taken with a poor 1.2mpx cam 6 years ago?--Avala (talk) 09:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
    • My view exactly. I would welcome your participation in the lively discussion going on here. -- JovanCormac 20:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep /Daniel78 (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep Of course --Tony Wills (talk) 10:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Sounds like an argument :).--Avala (talk) 09:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

:-), I am glad you appreciate the succinctness of it ;-) --Tony Wills (talk) 22:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Keep Very rare auto -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
  • This is about the quality of the photo, not the rarity of the subject.--Avala (talk) 09:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

No, this is not QI, this is FP, technical quality is one aspect --Tony Wills (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Keep --Lošmi (talk) 06:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist —kallerna™ 13:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
•  KeepTer890 (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Delist -- I don't like the environment; the background is distracting. If it's worth value, consider VP. ZooFari 22:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

 Question In your opinion, what is FP for? --Tony Wills (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I see FP as a program to acknowledge images that have the least technical issues and are an asset to the Wikimedia projects. If I'm wrong, don't tackle me please. ZooFari 22:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 delist, 6 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /Daniel78 (talk) 09:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC)