Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sydney night 4.jpg

Info created by Wj32 - uploaded by Wj32 - nominated by Wj32. Also see Image:Sydney night 5.jpg for a shot at a slightly later time. The version on the left is the original, the version on the right is edited, removing some grain and correcting some colours. --Wj32 03:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment huh? just because it looks better at night... in fact, i can't see ANY featured night pictures on this page. --Wj32 08:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question What are the white dots all over the place on the image in full resolution ? --Atoma 08:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Info (sigh) crappy camera or lens. maybe someone else could remove them? --Wj32 08:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment Yeah, that's a pitty. 20 second exposition must be the cause ==> this caused visible noise, but I must admit, it is rather strage. Thanks to Fuji ! Still, you could probably clone these out with an image editing software, which would improve image quality. The white dots are pretty disturbing. --Atoma 14:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment After investigation I think it is thermal noise. --Atoma 17:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support / tsca @ 21:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Lycaon; don't like the glare from the street lights - MPF 23:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Which ones? --Wj32 08:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - all of them, but the ones on the middle of the bridge, the cluster below the right end of the bridge, the one just right of the opera house, and the bright red one in the distance near the centre of the pic, are particularly disturbing - MPF 12:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment why do people not want to vote here? why skip this? if you don't like this picture, oppose! if you like it, support! don't do nothing. --Wj32 07:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment - It's true, people don't want to vote. Because it's not that good to be FP, it's not that bad to not be FP. they are mostly neutral. Anyway, my edit dealt with most problems.--02:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC) —the preceding unsigned comment is by Arad (talk • contribs)

 2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured

Comment Please get organized and decide where your votes go! - Alvesgaspar 00:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 0 support, 0 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 11:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info Removed most of the noise. And here is the result. --Arad 23:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Guys you can vote, no one is going to bite you. --Arad 22:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 19:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with MPF. Glare is disturbing and some are oversaturated. Otherwise nice picture. Great composition. -- Simonizer 11:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 23:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contents