Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Swan displaying.6669.2.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Swan displaying.6669.2.JPG[edit]
*
Left Version, not featured[edit]
Info created, uploaded & nominated by Ben Aveling 10:30, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Support
Oppose bizarre format. Rama 12:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Neutral i actually like the format. I am just not sure if there aren't some colour-improvements possible. --AngMoKio 17:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)- Support --Mbz1 13:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
- Oppose I'm not sure about the format, but I'm sure swans aren't blue --che 20:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Lighting. --Beyond silence 20:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Back lighting and color problems. -- Ram-Man 23:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Right Version, not featured[edit]
Comment added colour adjusted version Lycaon 11:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)- Oppose The color is much better and it now looks like it was taken in warm evening light streaming through trees or something similar. However, the noise and lack of detail, especially in that of the swan's underside, prevents me from supporting. This should be closer to perfection for an FP, but the picture is certainly now more useful. -- Ram-Man 12:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support--Mbz1 13:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
- Oppose Noise yet.--Beyond silence 03:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support Vassil 07:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Support Thanks Lycaon, clearly much improved. The original image is straight from camera, except for cropping. (The original, uncropped, is at Image:Swan displaying.6669.JPG) The light was mid afternoon, through trees. So basically shade, but not completely. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral - I cannot oppose this superb composition. But the noise is still quite obvious. - Alvesgaspar 15:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 09:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
