Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Schlossvaduz.jpg

Image:Schlossvaduz.jpg - not featured

• This great picture of one beautiful place was created by Michael Gredenberg - uploaded by Mschlindwein - nominated by me. --.:. Sarazyn 17:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --.:. Sarazyn 17:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support This is already a FP on wikipedia. It is a great picture despite the low resolution. --Digon3 17:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree it is nice but there are no "strong mitigating reasons" to ignore the guidelines (at least 2 millinos pixels!) - Alvesgaspar 21:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Where are these guidelines to be found? .:. Sarazyn 00:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

A little above from where you are now - Alvesgaspar 00:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

But only on the english page. So change your language to english and then you can see the guidelines -- Simonizer 07:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I still can't find a rule that states "only big-ass pics". .:. Sarazyn 20:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Here it is: Resolution - graphics located on Commons may be used in ways other than viewing on a conventional computer screen. They may be also used for printing or for viewing on very high resolution monitors. We can't predict what devices may be used in the future, so it is important that pictures being nominated have as high a resolution as possible. At least 2 million pixels (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now. Images of lower resolution are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. -- Simonizer 15:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment - it has already been voted on here and failed to be featured - MPF 21:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would support if it respected the "big-ass pics" rule. --Atoma 00:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support The pixel rule doesn't sound categorical to me ("seems" and "reasonable"), and the picture is not one of the really tiny ones. I like the composition and the colors. --Ibn Battuta 05:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment The image is not even large enough to be set as a wallpaper. And it could be a very good wallpaper. --Atoma 12:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Support The composition is great, and the resolution seems acceptable to me. -- 790 16:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Resolution! See comment above -- Simonizer 08:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

 4 support, 3 oppose > not featured Alvesgaspar 23:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)