Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Roche.gif

Image:Roche.gif, not featured

•  Info created by Pako- - uploaded by Pako- - nominated by ShakataGaNai ^Talk 03:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Rock On! In the words of Brynn "This is the epitome of what all rocks aspire to be" -- ShakataGaNai ^Talk 03:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Also currently undergoing matching Deletion Request --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 03:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose, copyvio. Derivative work. Copyright owned by God. Bjweeks (talk) 03:15, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment After some 6000 years, surely the copyright has expired? :-) Korax1214 (talk) 10:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment Irrelevant! Copyright is granted ad vitam eternam to God :> ! Esby (talk) 11:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Support per Brynn. Soxred93 (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support This one certainly leaves me speechless. Also, not a single bit of noise! While it doesn't meet the typical resolution requirements, I am quite confident that increased resolution would not improve it in the slightest. --Gmaxwell (talk) 03:17, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support This is communing with nature at its finest. Who needs fancy macros of insects when a simple image of the most basic building blocks of Earth will do? Arria Belli | parlami 03:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support This is the epitome of what all rocks aspire to be. Also, it evokes feelings of stability and permanence, which are very rock-like qualities. Brynn_(talk) 03:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
• Strong  Oppose Seriously, what is so great about this image? And so many supports? I suspect sock puppets Muhammad 08:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose, it's a black blob. --Aqwis (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose - This nom is meant as a joke, hopefully? --typhoonchaser 11:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
• ( Oppose. Yeah its a rock, but its also a GIF file. GIFs are a no-no for things other than animations. ViperSnake151 (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment Surely the above is actually a guideline rather than a hard-and-fast rule? Should I ever create a fractal worth sharing, I'll upload it as a GIF so as to preserve the Fractint metadata. -- Korax1214 (talk) 10:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose <FPC copypasta>Too noisy, DOF too shallow</FPC copypasta> Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 13:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Géolocation is missing!Esby (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral Lovely bokeh and good usage of DOF but colors are a tad too bright, sorry --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see why this should be a featured picture. -Kanonkas_(talk) 15:22, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose What is going on here! Is this a joke? --βαςε_LXIV™ 15:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose What's it? :) --Dsmurat (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral Profound in it's simplicity. Rough edges though, I'll support an anti-aliased version. --Calibas (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
  •  Support Anti-aliased version I think we have a POTY 2008 winner already! --Calibas (talk) 01:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose I have no sense of humor. – flamurai 16:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, too small Thank you for the amusement. --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
  • It already has more than one support vote, so you can't get rid of it via FPX. Nice try, Freedom to share (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe good for throwing at image quality quibblers but not for showing on the Main Page (except on 1st of April). ;-) And having an image noncategorized IMO gives a really bad example. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support It's a brilliant shadow photo of a rock, and it has no pixellation at all. -Nard 19:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kanonkas--Mbz1 (talk) 19:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Please, you're hurting its feelings with all the opposes! Thegreenj (talk) 20:36, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good joke for testing the reactions. -- MJJR (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Joke Know Nothing (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Contrast too high. Snowwayout (talk) 23:32, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kanonkas. —αἰτίας •discussion• 00:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  April Fools was a few months ago . giggy _(:O) 04:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• the svg version is gr8 dood. Featured picture of the day everyday! Monobi (talk) 04:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose No surface detail on the rock. Need a better lighting for such a studio shot. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  LOL. That's an oppose, by the way ;) weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 08:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Lies! {{Awesome}} clearly is a support vote! You Can't Stop the Rock!!! --ShakataGaNai ^Talk 09:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Opposethis picture don't add any emotions for me. Otourly (talk) 09:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Another angle would have been better. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's two dimensional, remember -- so it turns out we already have one. Yay! Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 17:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment. Reminds me of when I nominated Awesome Face for featured picture. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You can't stop the ROCK

•  Oppose. This one left me speechless. No "wow factor" + No volume + No texture = No value. G.A.S 13:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Kanonkas, and no wow. Leo Johannes (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support per WP:SNOW. Rocket000 (talk) 09:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 22 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

• • Thanks for the extra-work --Simonizer (talk) 08:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose A rock? Should we nominate as FP a dot soon? Alvaro qc (talk) 03:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 11 support, 24 oppose, 0 neutral => vote never ends. --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 08:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Including the awesome supports, awesome opposes, rockons & other misc odd votes. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 08:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)