Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Reading glasses.jpg

Image:Reading glasses.jpg - not featured

•  Info created by Dori — uploaded by Dori — nominated by Dori | Talk 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral Self-nom, trying to see if I've gotten any better at taking pictures. Dori | Talk 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurry subject, disturbed and overexposed background, ill-suited colours, boring composition - and nothing outstanding whatsoever. Roger McLassus 06:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's blurry because the photographer hasn't her|his glasses put on (just kidding). Francisco M. Marzoa 11:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
    • That's what I get for trying to be artistic. I was going for in focus for the glasses, the background out of focus. Dori | Talk 13:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose per RogerMcLassus, it's blurry and overexposed background. Indon 07:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Simplistic beauty. That shows talent - making something ordinary look good. --Fir0002 www 08:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose shadow, distracting background Erina 09:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose like Roger McLassus [vote by Jacopo86 - Roger McLassus 13:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC) ]
•  Oppose Background :-( Francisco M. Marzoa 11:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support too few of such pics are here; we need more artistic photos without the typical well-known and boring compositions.--AngMoKio 15:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose ok image.not fp worthy at all though Vanillatea 23:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass ^demandez 20:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not good enough. Nothing again minimalism but it has to be carefully prepared and executed. Background is distracting. Alvesgaspar 23:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tbc 11:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose maybe b/w would be nicer SimONE
•  Support Spoken 23:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

4 support, 9 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured Roger McLassus 06:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)