Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Panorama of Mt Elizabeth and hills.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Panorama of Mt Elizabeth and hills.jpg[edit]

Short description

  • I think it's a little high too. Benh 11:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The saturation looks fine to me, just look at the trees in the distance. The sky is the only thing that looks wrong to me, but that's not due to the saturation. This image has a lot of contrast due to the lighting, but the lighting is also the point of this image. -- Ram-Man 12:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - After this pano everything else looks almost trivial (don't you know that the best wine is never served at the begining of the meal?). I don't like the large, dark and dull foregroung as well as the artificial look of the sky. - Alvesgaspar 20:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I thought the exact same thing as Alvesgaspar. It's one thing when other people are adding so many high quality images that your own don't look as good anymore, it's quite another thing when you upstage yourself. -- Ram-Man 20:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral You have forgotten to adjust the overexposed sky between some branches on the tree on top of the left hill. ;) --Makro Freak 22:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment - If the sky is really an artificial one than the template RetouchedPicture should be used. - Alvesgaspar 23:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's not artificial, but it was a bit overexposed so I did some adjustment layers on it to bring it back using the advanced blending modes (which is like using an axe to make watches) which put fringing on most of the horizon and I had to go and manualy mask the fringing out. Anyway I'll fix the sky, I can re-use the old mask.--Benjamint444 00:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar. --Digon3 14:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral The sky is so differently, so awkwardly exposed compared to the rest of the picture that it makes me uneasy watching it. --Digitaldreamer 23:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]