Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Narzisse.jpg

Image:Narzisse.jpg, featured

•  Info created, uploaded & nominated by Know Nothing -- Know Nothing (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Wild daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus)
•  Support -- Know Nothing (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing bokeh. Freedom to share (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Very simple and elegant. Possibly the best part of this is the razor thin DOF which captures a crisp line of grass at the bottom. victorrocha (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support, very beautiful, great composition. --Aqwis (talk) 18:27, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral Oppose Very nice composition but not sharp enough(I don't care the stalk is out of focus but the flower is too blurry.) and overexposure and DOF is a little shallow. --Laitche (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose DOF too shallow, the stalk is almost completely out of focus --Romwriter (talk) 20:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Simonizer (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely, perfect aperture choice. --Calibas (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice job. --Dsmurat (talk) 16:25, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:20, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very nice picture, good composition. —αἰτίας •discussion• 00:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Improper DOF. Lycaon (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support At 11 Mpx, there's no need to argue about the little blur, as it's better to have a blurry 11 Mpx image than a sharp downsampled 3 mpx. I don't usually vote for flowers because I find that borring, but this one has a little something that makes it really great. --S23678 (talk) 03:25, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Really amazing. I agree with S23678 that this picture is much less boring than other flowers. Leo Johannes (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Elegant -- Dhatfield (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support ~ Idiot (talk) 14:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Lestat (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --.snoopy. 08:08, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Narzisse.jpg, Edit2, not featured

•  Info bigger version. -- Laitche (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment I like this pic very much but the flower of the original is so blurry then I couldn't support the original.... -- Laitche (talk) 13:22, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer (talk) 07:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Narzisse.jpg, Edit1, not featured

•  Info Down sampling, sharp, overexposure correction. -- Laitche (talk) 06:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laitche (talk) 06:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose why downsample? – flamurai 08:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

• I think the size is not so important for this kind of pic, other factors are much more important. :) -- Laitche (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose, size is not less important for this picture than for any other. --Aqwis (talk) 10:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose to much Sharpness Know Nothing (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Thanks. -- Laitche (talk) 04:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

result: Withdrawn => not featured. -- Laitche (talk) 04:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)