Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Miniture rose gnangarra.jpg

Support -- Gnangarra 10:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- excellent quality picture, but the pot bothers me... maybe I'll reconsider this later... -- nico@nc 11:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--Shizhao 11:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- For the most part it is a nice picture but there is some noticable fringing. -- Killeroy 21:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unspectacular. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Joonasl 16:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not bad, but not outstanding either -- Fabien1309 19:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose pot bothers, unspectacular --Luc Viatour 09:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose cropping, backroung 'Pertsa 14:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support if you suitably crop out the pot. Beautiful photo of rose. Fg2 00:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

results 2  Support, 1  Neutral, 6  Oppose Gnangarra 05:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Image cropped to reduce background, especially the pot as per original nomination. Cropped version by Gnangarra and nominated by Gnangarra 05:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Gnangarra 05:36, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Centring... and not an exceptionnal flower. -- El ComandanteHasta ∞ 19:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- yes, it's better -- nico@nc 22:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support This really lets us concentrate on the beautiful flower. Fg2 21:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good but not outstanding. Flower not in the centre. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 00:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - there's masses of good pics of named rose cultivars; this one doesn't even have a name - MPF 18:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --ßøuñçê Y2K 13:40, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 3  Support, 4  Oppose => not featured Mglanznig 15:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu