Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Jacques-Louis David - Mars desarme par Venus.JPG

Image:Jacques-Louis David - Mars desarme par Venus.JPG, not featured

•  Info created by Szilas - uploaded by Szilas - nominated by Szilas --Szilas 13:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Szilas 13:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose colours are not correct and the picture suffers from excessive noise. -- Lycaon 13:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Question - How do you know, dear Lycaon, that the colours are not correct?--Szilas 14:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 16:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Mbz1
•  Oppose Lovely painting, but if you look at in in full resolution, everything's full of red, green and blue flecks, like a George Seurrat painting. I'd be extremely surprised if an early 19th-century painting really looked like that up close. Adam Cuerden 18:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love J L David, but colours of this reproduction fail. I have an illustration of this work on a book and colours look softer. --Javier ME 22:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lot of chromatic noise. I thought that he EOS400D at 1600ISO was better than this (I have the 20D, older). -- J-Luc 11:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment Apparently, he used DPP to process a RAW file, and maybe noise are that visible because of the NR settings. Benh 18:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment The arch at the top is not straight-- is this per the original, or is the scan crooked or a bit bent? Spikebrennan 13:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

- It's the original. I improved a bit the colours in the Commons, but I didn't re-load the picture here. It is a more than 3 meter high painting, it is no use to get too close to it, not even when studying the full resolution...--Szilas 11:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

 Comment You can find the left upper part of the backrgound structure curved in printed versions of the picture, too. --Javier ME 16:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

•  Info I corrected the noise. --Ikiwaner 20:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice painting but a bad reproduction. I'd wish an accurate colour rendering in a reproduction like this. Sharpness is substandard too. --Ikiwaner 20:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 08:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)