Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gustav Klimt 046.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Gustav Klimt 046.jpg, not featured[edit]
Info created by (Gustav Klimt) - uploaded by File Upload Bot (Eloquence) - nominated by Gryffindor
Support one of Klimt's most famous paintings --Gryffindor 17:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)- Support --Luc Viatour 17:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Strong support. El Comandante
Hasta ∞ 18:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Oppose - not attractive - MPF 22:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's just the more expensive painting of the world... Not very attractive, for sure! El ComandanteHasta ∞ 01:46, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- exactly.. why anyone would pay $135 million dollars for an "unattractive" painting is very strange :-) Gryffindor 07:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Different people have different perceptions, likes and dislikes. I don't see why I should be forced to like it, just because a different (and grotesquely rich) person does - MPF 13:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's just the more expensive painting of the world... Not very attractive, for sure! El Comandante
- Support Gordo 07:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Artist 14:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --New Painter 15:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support The subject of the image is ugly as hell (and whoever bought it for $ 135 million should be admitted to a psychiatric hospital), but the picture itself is of good quality, so there's no reason it shouldn't be featured. Jon Harald Søby 11:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Lerdsuwa 15:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Strong oppose I don't care about how much someone paid for it. And I don't agree that the photo itself is of good quality - looks smudged. And if not for the gold, I would not put this in my own house. This is definitely not one of the best or more useful pictures on Wikicommons--Konstable 12:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)- Oppose. The work is indeed important and it's not really my business to judge whether it "should" be considered as valued a piece of art as it apparently is. However this is not a particularly good reproduction, IMO; it looks smudged/blurry, and the colors don't really come out well. --Delirium 22:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --- gildemax 21:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 12:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support If there's any smudging, you'd have to really be looking for it. At any normal zoom, this reproduction looks great. QuartierLatin1968 19:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sigfrid 12:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Support I for one absolutely admire this painting. It is gorgeous and indescribably stunning, as I have seen the painting with my own two eyes in a Gustav Klimt exhibition. Aside from my personal comment, however, I think the image is excellent in normal zoom (maybe it could be downsized a bit and it could be brightened up a bit)...other than that it's perfectly fine--Vircabutar 00:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Voting ended on 17:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC) votes after this time are invalid
Result: 9Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
