Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Golden Gate Bridge Yang Ming Line.jpg

Image:Golden Gate Bridge Yang Ming Line.jpg, featured

•  Info Made, uploaded and nominated by User Bastique. I've taken a lot of photographs during my vacation, but this one stands out particularly. The juxtaposition of the fog partially obstructing the rear bridge tower and the freighter passing beneath really provided a way for me to demonstrate the magnitude of size. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 06:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Orgullomoore 07:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Luke1ace 08:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with you, Bastique, the composition is really good. It's a pity that the technical quality is not that good. Noisy, blurry and getting darker from left side to the right norro 10:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral it is really too bad that this photo is noisy and blur. The composition is great. --AngMoKio 10:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- I like the fog -- YolanC 12:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --snty-tact (Talk) 13:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Alhen .::··¨ 14:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Great depth, great mood, very evocative Gordo 15:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support freaking awesome.pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like it a lot. --Golbez 17:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Luc Viatour 18:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral, really neat picture of the fog, but kind of grainy. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Terrible image quality. None too interesting subject. --Fir0002 www 06:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree norro, plus some barrel distortion as well? Good atmosphere, but not PP quality --Rodge 14:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose - ditto to Norro, should have been saved at a higher quality level. The cable stays are very grainy at full size. - MPF 18:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Gérard Janot 20:44, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Tarawneh 21:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good picture, but not enough to be featured (technical quality and esthetical emotion). El ComandanteHasta ∞ 10:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support because of the very nice subject, although the quality problem is there. --Ggonnell 13:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Ggonnell. The quality problems are minor as compared to the composition and the athmosphere captured in this image. --wg 22:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 13:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I like it--Eirissa 20:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- Get_It (Talk) 14:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support I guess I never voted! Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 00:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support cool TZM ^de:T/_{T C} 12:36, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

DATE LIMIT : 18 June 2006

•  Oppose - Lycaon 18:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --MRB 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

RESULT : 15 Support, 7 Oppose, 3 Neutral => featured (El ComandanteHasta ∞ 19:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC))