Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:GDANSK, Falowiec na Obroncow Wybrzeza.JPG

Image:GDANSK, Falowiec na Obroncow Wybrzeza.JPG, not featured

•  Info created by rossny - uploaded by rosny - nominated by rossny 06:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • what? Who is rosny? The picture was taken by Johan von Nameh.
•  Support --24.86.215.144 06:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC) Please log in to vote - and note this was uploaded by User:Tsca pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support, though it could use less sky. --Golbez 07:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• I've searched through the commons looking for pictures of communist housing projects, and this is the most impressive one i've found. There are some others that are interesting (search "plattenbau" or "rostock") but this one is the longest i've seen, and the photo is of good quality. So i nominated it. i think the plattenbau deserves its day in the sun.24.86.215.144 06:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC) by the way, i've never encountered anything on wikimedia/etc more complicated than this process. Someone should really rewrite the instructions on how to nominate an image, because I really had no idea what was going on. NO CLUE.

  Hi. You are right, the process is not that easy. If you have ideas to improve it, don't hesitate to tell them. Perhaps here or here. There is still the possibility to reengineer it. norro 15:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

•  Oppose Instructive and good snapshot but, for me, no esthetical nor historical emotion. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 08:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Ggonnell 09:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support good vantage point pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support -- amazing -- YolanC 09:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support very illustrative --che 10:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Ss181292 10:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC) -- It is maybe not most common communist housing project, but I like it.
•  Support Gérard Janot 15:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- it might be illustrative but it is no good angle. the parking space (or park?) to the right is as unnecessary as is the big portion of (partially overexposed) sky. sorry. :-) -- Boereck 15:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose due to lighting. Partly overexposed (sky and white buildings in the middleground) and facades in the shadow. Composition not to interesting norro 12:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Boereck --Rodge500 21:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Artefacto 02:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --ßøuñçêY2K 14:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose--Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: fala comigo} 15:03, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Fastfood 00:16, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support Refreshingly different, definitely illustrative and useful. You can overlook small lighting problems in cases like this. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 04:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose may be it's an impressive example of communist housing estate, but it has nothing in common with the most of them, it's a very special case —Slovik 09:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - Interesting subject -- Lerdsuwa 13:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --XN 20:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support - I don't think you have to find a picture "pretty" for it to be featured Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 00:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support / tsca @ 14:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 16:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --New Painter 15:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Result: 14  Support, 9  Oppose and 0  Neutral => not featured. --Lycaon 09:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC)