Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Flood03.jpg

Image:Flood03.jpg, not featured

1998 floods in Swifts Creek

Same location but taken 8 years later

Combination

•  Info Nominated by Fir0002 (self nom). Not a conventional nomination, but I thought it more usefull to have the pix seperate so that you can easily (assuming you use firefox} flip between tabs and compare. I can easily put them together as a single image if it makes it easier for promotion
•  Support --Fir0002 www 03:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support --Ggonnell 10:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Comment Which one are you nominating? Both? A composite we haven't seen yet? I'm not going to vote on something you haven't created yet. pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support both. I dont think it should be composed to one big jpeg. IMO suitable compostite would be of the two images in layers of one file, which is currently impossible, but may be in the future...--Wikimol 19:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support . Both. --Yearofthedragon 19:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support both (tho' I hope it didn't take 8 years for the flood to recede!!) - MPF 22:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose. I don't understand what the interest of only one of these two pictures. I'd rather vote for a montage like for the FP Image:Nagasaki 1945 - Before and after (adjusted).jpg. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 01:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --- gildemax 21:06, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose Useful record no doubt, but not outstanding images in their own right --Rodge 12:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Uploaded a combined version --Fir0002 www 12:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Lmbuga ^{gl, pt, es: contacta comigo} 12:08, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Oppose --> Great idea, but poor photo quality(Cluttered, dull light etc) Snowwayout 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
•  Support--Darz Mol 22:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Result: 6  Support, 5  Oppose and 0  Neutral => not featured. -- Lycaon 22:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)