Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fiescheralp-Wallis.jpg

Image:Fiescheralp-Wallis.jpg, not featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tobi 87 -- Tobi 87 (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tobi 87 (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful panorama. Perhaps it would look a little bit better with a stronger contrast. Manuel R. (talk) 19:28, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose, too much sky and too little detail. --Aqwis (talk) 09:49, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support sky & detail ok ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support nice view --Simonizer (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support nice and detailed view, about the right amount of sky -- Klaus with K (talk) 14:03, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good framing on the sides. Cirt (talk) 04:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose not sharp enough IMO. --Sanchezn (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Not sharp? Really?--Sensl (talk) 17:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, in my opinion this picture is not enough sharp to be FP. You never contribute any picture, so at least be courteous (lots of your comments are insulting). --Sanchezn (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• Look who's talking about courtesy! I'm not sure I understood you,Sanchezn. To whom I should be courteous to you as to opposer or to Tobi 87 as a photographer and why my support vote on the the image is insulting to you? Don't you think that it is not exactly courteous to support image taken by your personal friend benh with the vote that the image author himself calls bias? the benh image should be promoted or not promoted, but without you supporting it. Do you still want to discuss what is and what is not courteous?--Sensl (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• I only supported Benh's picture because it's asked when you contest a FPX (and I still think your reasons were bad). I also supported this picture because I know it will not be featured. About courtesy, comments like "not even close to fp", "A very, very bad photo shop" or "No details in anything, bad lighting, very low quality of a common subject" are not acceptable, especially from someone that doesn't contribute with pictures. In spite of everything, I'm really surprised a user that contributes since july 25 june 5 knows benh is my personal friend? --Sanchezn (talk) 20:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• You supported your friend image because you know it is not going to be promoted? Is that right? How interesting! There's no mystery how I learned you and benh are friends. Both of you used the word "courteous" . It is not a common word to use here and it seemed strange to me. I went to your user page and learned that both of you live in France, share the same interests in photography and I saw an image with the description : me and benh working at the same panorama or something like that. Then I knew you were friends. Now, when I know you are roommates too, I assume you're using not only the same uncommon words, but the same IP too? --Sensl (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• Yes we have the same IP and we use the same words!!!!! and???? --Sanchezn (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

• I'd like to justify. I've already told that sanchezn is my long time friend and temporarily a roomate of mine. Although this wouldn't be against the rules, we try not to biase our votes when reviewing a picture of each other. Here, sanchezn just wanted to remove the FPX template, but by doing so, he had to add the support template (or have I got something wrong ?). I told him not to, but he went ahead, as he felt this wouldn't have a lot of consequences. So I don't think there's some insult with sanchezn's votes, and contributions to commons and wikipedia in general. They actually are useful, unlike some harsh comments over here. Benh (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose As Aqwis. --Karelj (talk) 20:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Reflection of Perfection (talk) 04:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am not convinced by the composition. There is no real focal point to draw the eye. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 06:26, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per MichaelMaggs and it does not show enough detail in my opinion. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 13:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per all opposers (but I think right amount of sky). Benh (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support-- DarkAp89  Commons 21:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- No subject is the focus of the image. 203.160.118.97 06:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC) please log-in to vote Benh (talk) 07:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose noise, shadow --Beyond silence 20:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)