Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bush Cockroach.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Bush Cockroach.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2010 at 21:19:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Cyron Ray Macey - uploaded by Boricuaeddie - nominated by 190.248.177.127 -- 190.248.177.127 21:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Support -- 190.248.177.127 21:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Please log in to vote. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)- Oppose The head and antennae are out of focus, and it is very noisy, sorry. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Question What is the meaning of noisy? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.248.177.127 (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC) (UTC)
- Oppose Correct, particularly the head is out of focus. Macro photography is very strict in that the depth of field is very shallow. Macro photographers should pay special attention to having the essential element of the subject in sharp focus. In my opinion, the head should have been razor-sharp!--Murdockcrc (talk) 10:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Nice lighting and colors, but DOF is too shallow for Commons' insanely high bug standards.--IdLoveOne (talk) 18:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Support: I see no noise, and I like the shallow DOF. –hoverFly | chat? 21:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ok then. --IdLoveOne (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Murdockcrc. some noise in the bokeh is fine - better than a blurred background. the image was shot with ISO 100 - seems to be the least noise possible with the camera. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 23:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results: