Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bush-cricket 02 (MK).JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Bush-cricket 02 (MK).JPG, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2009 at 04:12:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info everything by Leviathan (talk) 04:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Leviathan (talk) 04:12, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 06:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment In my view, the dark green spot in the upper right corner is not needed. - Darius Baužys → talk 07:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- The dark green spot is a leaf of the bush, at this angle it wasn´t avoidable and I don´t want to clon it out. BG Leviathan (talk) 07:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Why? IMO, this bush sheet does not contain any additional information for a photo. Only a little distracting. - Darius Baužys → talk 08:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- It adds information about the environment, that the insect was in a living place. Diti the penguin — 08:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Why? IMO, this bush sheet does not contain any additional information for a photo. Only a little distracting. - Darius Baužys → talk 08:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- The dark green spot is a leaf of the bush, at this angle it wasn´t avoidable and I don´t want to clon it out. BG Leviathan (talk) 07:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Seems underexposed, I suggest you bring the white point way back. Flying Freddy (talk) 08:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes maybe its a little to dark but ther was very difficult lightning (completly in shadow) when I shot this photo. I also tried it not so dark, with longer exposure time but it wasn`t so nice, in fact the reflections on the body where much more and the background was not really nice... And, don´t forget, from time to time these little beasts are moving a little bit... BG Leviathan (talk) 12:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Imo the exposure can be fixed in photoshop, would you permit me to upload an edit? Still don't think the quality is there, maybe VP but not FP for me. Flying Freddy (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah thats right, I could trie to fix it with Photoshop, I´ll do it today and then I will upload a little lighter version... BG 192.77.114.200 03:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)I´m so sorry but it looks like reading too fast so early at the morning isn´t so good for me! Of course you can upload an edit! Sorry for this missunderstanding! BG Leviathan (talk) 14:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Imo the exposure can be fixed in photoshop, would you permit me to upload an edit? Still don't think the quality is there, maybe VP but not FP for me. Flying Freddy (talk) 02:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes maybe its a little to dark but ther was very difficult lightning (completly in shadow) when I shot this photo. I also tried it not so dark, with longer exposure time but it wasn`t so nice, in fact the reflections on the body where much more and the background was not really nice... And, don´t forget, from time to time these little beasts are moving a little bit... BG Leviathan (talk) 12:13, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbz1 (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support I'd like to see an edit, a brightened version, because I think it could improve this. But I also think this is ok as it is. Maedin\talk 12:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 19:46, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Alt 1[edit]
Comment Sorry for the break, but I was a little busy the last days! Now I've edited the picture and upload an alternative version. Little more Gamma and adjusted the white point. Now you, I'm really interested wich one you like more. BG Leviathan (talk) 09:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods
The chosen alternative is: Image:Bush-cricket 02 (MK).JPG