Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahnsteighdr.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Bahnsteighdr.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2010 at 06:29:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Powerhauer - uploaded by Powerhauer - nominated by Powerhauer -- Powerhauer (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Powerhauer (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Question What is shown on the picture? What could be illustrated with it? --Спас Колев (talk) 08:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Oppose good example for an overdone HDR image. The quality is bad and using HDR brings no advantage over "standard" fotography or carefully exposure blended pictures. --mathias K 09:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)- Oppose, I'm very sorry :( What I like is the composition, but the technical realization is very bad. Some parts of the sky are grainy, some others just has some small noise and the next is very soft. Another piece of the image is in nice quality, the next is very unsharp and noisy. I like the light and the colours from the HDR, even if it's now oversaturated and it has at some parts a halo effect. Do you use a tripod? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Good HDR, but Nnot of the best educational quality. Steven Walling 17:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Extreme noise and overdone HDR. Diti the penguin — 10:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Grotesque light levels; also description "Bahnsteig" completely inadequate (where is it? why do the rails disappear into an apparent building site? why do the steps at the end of the platform descend into a shrub bed, not the platform?). - MPF (talk) 10:11, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
