Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anime Girl.svg

Image:Anime Girl.svg, featured

Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2008 at 20:18:23

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Niabot -- Niabot (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Note that i provided also an PNG-Version (right image) of this drawing, because the current renderer of Wikipedia (librsvg) makes some errors while rendering SVG-Images. -- Niabot (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support see the KEB talk at german wikipedia for the reasons, too tired to translate :p HardDisk (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very nice.   ■ MMXX^talk  07:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support G.A.S 07:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support WOW (SVG version). --libertad0 ॐ (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- it seems that the wow factor is very high here. but its much below 2 mp and the value isn't clear for me. to illustrate the manga style, you could nearly take any manga picture. Manuel R. (talk) 18:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment SVG files are resizable to infinity. Transform it to a 100,000,000px-wide PNG picture if you want. Diti (talk to the penguin) 18:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment As already noted, this file is resolution independent. Look at the exported PNG file it exceeds your limit at ease (>6 mp). An you cant use any picture. Other language versions need free pictures, because they cant use "fair use". --Niabot (talk) 18:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Amazing SVG file and beautiful result for Inkscape! Diti (talk to the penguin) 18:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very nice, I also like the fact that it's svg (even though wikipedia doesn't render it correctly) -- Gorgo (talk) 00:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment - Please make a different section for each version. This way it is impossible to decide which one is being supported or opposed -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Both are the same Pictures, that should be ideally equal. The only difference is storage format. The better and more valuable file is the SVG version (left image), even if the renderer of wikipedia sucks in displaying it. This is the real work. A with Inkscape exported version is the better looking PNG-File. So all votes count for the first (left) image, even if you may use the PNG-Version for an article, because the wp renderer sucks (but maybe improved over time). --Niabot (talk) 13:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
    • If, as you claim, the Wiki renderer sucks, then how can we assess objectively that the SVG version was properly constructed? My own SVG's (which, I admit, are far less complex) render just fine. Lycaon (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
      • You can use any newer Version of Opera, Firefox or Inkscape to verify the result of the SVG-File. But be patient, the renderingspeed of Firefox and Opera is not very good. The results are just fine, even if Firefox does only implement about 50% of the SVG standard. --Niabot (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC) PS: We have many images that are showing bugs with librsvg. So take a look inside Category:Pictures showing a librsvg bug.
•  Support Wow factor -- DarkAp89  Commons 17:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Romwriter (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --D-Kuru (talk) 14:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very nice, must be quite hard to make such an image! --Kanonkas_(talk) 15:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great quality for SVG work --Twdragon (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Econt (talk) 21:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Can't load it, can't support it, sorry (Firefox 3.03). Lycaon (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Dont know why, but im running Firefox 3.0.1 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070206 Firefox/3.0.1) and it works just fine. But it takes a while until the image is displayed. Btw. cant load, cant support? cant load, cant vote? --Niabot (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment If you couldn't load the image, how did you vote ?!   ■ MMXX^talk  07:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment If the SVG would rendering anything like the png version, I'd support happily. But this will (likely) be on the front page and if only 10% of users or casual visitors cannot access the file properly, then it is bad publicity for Commons, and hence not the best of the best we can offer. Lycaon (talk) 07:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
    •  Comment This applies to any SVG-Image, since internet explorer can't handle SVG at all and it's market share is over 50%. But i modified and Uploaded the SVG-Version again. Now it passes the strict SVG validator, that ensures that the file itself has no errors. If your version of Firefox isn't able to display it, then somthing is messed up with your software. --Niabot (talk) 09:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful, I use Firefox as well and am able to open it. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Tintero (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support nice --Richard Bartz (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support too good to be true --Grootmoe (talk) 17:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

result: 17 supports, 2 oppose, 0 neutral =>  featured. Benh (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)