Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zukunft Kind.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Zukunft Kind.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2010 at 14:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Powerhauer - uploaded by Powerhauer - nominated by Powerhauer -- Powerhauer (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Powerhauer (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
- Question I'm not sure I see the educational value of this, but even if there is one, the translation irritates me. Do you mean "Children are the future"? I like the position of the teardrop. --99of9 (talk) 10:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Now Oppose. 99of9 (talk) 10:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment very interesting and a good picture. But too tight at the bottom imo. Could you correct it? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:10, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose off-topic encyclopedia --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - it isn't completely "off-topic" as an image like it could well be in scope, but this does have limited use because of non-ideomatic English. (I think the word "the" is missing.) Also, the font and layout could be improved. Jonathunder (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like the idea: children's face with the Earth as a background. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good photo montage/collage or mixed media, however you want to call it... The phrase is not necessarily wrong. To say children are future is the same as saying ice is cold, meat is food, soldiers are human, dreams are possible, etc., etc. We could also say children are innocent, children are beautiful, and of course, children are future. The key is to understand philosophically that in this case a noun, future, can be converted into an adjective, in order to add new meaning to old words. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- provocative Comment: This image was made by and for western northern people. I agree that children are future, or the future, but not only blue eyed caucasians, a minority on this planet ... I think that the concept could be otherwise illustrated.--Jebulon (talk) 10:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the highest quality educational media. Not even sure if it is educational at all, actually. Steven Walling 20:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. Jacopo Werther (talk) 18:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- This is a good example of photomontage and can be used as such. Still I agree with Jonathunder that the layout could be improved and find the words superflous. Why is the image cropped at bottom? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose As above and Alvesgaspar--Miguel Bugallo 20:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)