Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht vanaf het water op de Alde Feanen van het It Fryske Gea. Waardevol natuurgebied in Friesland 38.jpg

File:Zicht vanaf het water op de Alde Feanen van het It Fryske Gea. Waardevol natuurgebied in Friesland 38.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2015 at 18:46:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht vanaf het water op de Alde Feanen van het It Fryske Gea. Waardevol natuurgebied in Friesland 38.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht vanaf het water op de Alde Feanen van het It Fryske Gea. Waardevol natuurgebied in Friesland 38.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info Created and uploaded by Dominicus Johannes Bergsma - nominated by Code -- Code (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Saw this in QIC and found it simply overwhelming. Beautiful colours, nice mood and very clear composition. -- Code (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Per Code. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:04, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support I saw this in QIC as well and thought, the quality is not so good but maybe an FP :) --Laitche (talk) 19:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice postcard, but not a FP for me, a normal good picture. Short: no wow, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

• I'm giving up trying to understand your FP criteria. --Code (talk) 04:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• So did I for yours a long time ago.--Jebulon (talk) 14:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

-Horizon in the middle (an usual no-go)

-Light not extraordinary

-Boring subject

-Composition trivial (empty water for a third part). etc...--Jebulon (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Jebulon + unbalanced composition: too much water in the foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 23:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Das läuft wohl auf eine Geschmacksfrage hinaus, mir gefällt es.
•  Neutral for now. A tighter crop might help here. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

• weak  Support now --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

• Weak  Support Good. IMO too much water.--XRay ^talk 10:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon and Alchemist. Great mood, but that isn't enough to carry it. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Done Photo cropped.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Jebulon and Alchemist. --Karelj (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 12:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose For Jebulon --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
• @Famberhorst: Now it's completely tilted, look at the horizon. --Code (talk) 04:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
  • I would'nt say that... There is no horizon, but a coast line. How can you be sure it is parallel to the photographer ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:00, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

• I was talking about the file version from 18:09, 20. Okt. 2015. The actual version is fixed again. --Code (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 22:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The almost-but-not-quite-silhouette aspect of it doesn't convince me, nor does the composition. — Julian H.^✈ 11:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)