Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref10s3s4592.jpg

File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref10s3s4592.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2011 at 05:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref10s3s4592.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zentsu-ji in Zentsu-ji City Kagawa pref10s3s4592.jpg

61

4316

1106

230

3056

4592

Green chromatic aberrations on the edge of the shadow

•  Info all by me --663h (talk) 05:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- 663h (talk) 05:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice aesthetics. Just wondderful! -- Rodrigogomesonetwo (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment: Chromatic aberrations at full resolution. I am not expert enough to know if they are important enough to oppose.--Garrondo (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
  • There are no strict rules here, so if you think that they are bad enough to oppose, go ahead. In themselves I don't think i would oppose, but with the distracting branch on the side, I vote  Oppose. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose per The High Fin Sperm Whale.--Garrondo (talk) 14:10, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Neutral Great image and time of day to take it, but disappointingly unsharp. The fault of the camera it seems, not that I'm an expert. --IdLoveOne (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Perhaps, work that is more excellent than this will not appear for the time being in pagodas. --Laughaded (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality (esp. lack of sharpness and distortion at the bottom of the pic) are not sufficient for a FP. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion, good image quality and if anyone can improve it, then please do.--Snaevar (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose CA scattered and major problems of perspective on the buildings of backgournd --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 08:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:21, 12 January 2011 (UTC)