Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg

File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2016 at 08:01:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Slovenia
•  Info Wooden spiral stairs leading to VIP saloon. Handheld.
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry (talk) 08:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• nice picture, but sadly rather noisy and badly copped on upper part. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - I agree with Wladyslaw. Is it possible to denoise this photo? The crop is not a deal-breaker for me, because this composition is really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• Its hard to capture everyone. Anyway Wladyslaw, cart, Ikan Kekek denoise done on both pictures, went for 0,5 px Gauss, i still like to keep some details. Someone would put downsizing, upper is 15,92 MPx, while this is 13.8 MPx - out of 16 MPx. Maybe i will end at 6/6 supports, would be perfect. --Mile (talk) 10:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cut out of the black is very crudely done. Green tint and now it's blurred. -- Colin (talk) 12:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Colin put note, i cant see nothing of it. --Mile (talk) 06:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
  • See now what is your problem, that green tint is removing a bit of red channel all over, it was not that kind of red, despite maybe looking fine. --Mile (talk) 06:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I find this absolutely stunning despite the noise which could be reduced to some extent. It reminds me very much of a cephalopod skull. --AWeith (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 17:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Either version is fine with me.
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 07:06, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support. --AlmaBeta (talk) 04:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Alt

•  Info When i am not sure. This one is more to "thirds rule", but is missing railing. I am not sure which is good... will wait for some opinions. Ikan Kekek if i put more denoise i might loose details. I did already put some. However its fisheye lens, they are less tolarable to such stuff than good zooms. I am more on problem with cut - as Wladyslaw mentiones... Beware its handheld, ISO 1250, tripod couldnt go here. I even step up for some stairs not to be on shot. --Mile (talk) 08:56, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Will plus it. Denoise also possible Done, and on which one. Will wait. --Mile (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I like the tighter crop, it adds dynamic to the pic. Could do with a denoising though. --cart-Talk 10:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer the original crop. This crop is too tight for my liking. INeverCry (talk) 10:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The cut out of the black is very crudely done. Green tint and now it's blurred. -- Colin (talk) 12:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
• @Colin I did it on 400%, with soft round...and you dont like it. Looking is good and dont think its perfect rounded in real (i might upload original if..). You dont like Heaviside function, not my cutting. I will figure out something. --Mile (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • The cut out is less obvious now. But you've changed the colour balance towards green, which isn't nice, and I didn't see any problems with noise before but now it is quite blurred. I suggest people compare the two to see the loss of detail. -- Colin (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• • @Colin Sorry what ? It same denoising, i just started from original and put back same denoise for 0.5 px. What are you seeing is maybe your imagination. You might hurt your eyes with 200-300 % pixel-peeping. Sure, show people where is that problem, and to me too. --Mile (talk) 06:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
    • Also info from EXIF for both Tint:8, and you probably didnt interpret File history well: gently designed edges of "Heaviside step" staircase-black background + denoise ... +denoise was compared to original shot, people wanted a bit of denoising. So i did. I forgive you Colin. --Mile (talk) 07:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Looks glitzy. Goodmorninghpvn (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support I think this is the best we're going to get for now. Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Info "The cutting problem" of Colin gently done on both pictures, if still problem, then you have to show me. --Mile (talk) 08:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Either version is fine with me. M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 10:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Miha (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support. --AlmaBeta (talk) 04:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Either version is good for me, as I have this funny association with a cephalopod skull with both. --AWeith (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Jee 16:01, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 04:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Slovenia

The chosen alternative is: File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg

• It's pretty close; but favoring to "original". Jee 04:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)