Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waiting for customers.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Waiting for customers.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2010 at 15:37:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I find the image somewhat "distasteful" --Muhammad (talk) 17:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with Muhammad. Plus it's not a very well composed photo to begin with. Kaldari (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support I must respectfully disagree, this is a tasteful and artistic representation of the world's oldest profession. --ianaré (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Not so, this is a natural treatment for the varices! By the way, the legs (and not only) are full of artifacts. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support something different.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support High technical and compositional quality, and it's obviously informative. Whether or not you like the subject it informs one about is irrelevant. Steven Walling 23:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I respectfully agree with Muhammad. There are many other images of owners waiting for customers that are somewhat better.WikiYoung27 (talk) 00:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --патриот8790 (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 19:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Kleuske (talk) 16:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support I find the image somewhat "wonderfull" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent clean composition. Love it. --Slaunger (talk) 10:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna™ 18:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- I am with Muhammad on this one, artifacts per Alvesgaspar and focus not sharp on entire subject. G.A.S 04:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support--თეკა (talk) 11:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Ditto to Muhammad, and not very attractive - MPF (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough wow to feature it. I am sorry. Crapload (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose, as above. --Vprisivko (talk) 06:54, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)