Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Reikiavik desde el Paseo de la Bahía, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 150-153 PAN.jpg

File:Vista de Reikiavik desde el Paseo de la Bahía, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 150-153 PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2018 at 08:10:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Reikiavik desde el Paseo de la Bahía, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 150-153 PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Reikiavik desde el Paseo de la Bahía, Distrito de la Capital, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 150-153 PAN.jpg

17218

1491

1666

1684

20006

3508

Interesting here

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Panoramic view of Reykjavik and the Atlantic Ocean during sunset seen from the Shore Walk, Capital Region, Iceland. The city concentrates, with 123,300 inhabitants, 35% of the country population and was founded in around AD 870 by norwagian settlers. Poco² 08:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 08:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice work, but the stitching errors should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 08:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

  I will, Ermell, give me a few hours and I'll uploade a new version --Poco² 10:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

  Ermell:  Done Poco² 13:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose The problem with many extremely wide panoramas is that most of it doesn't contain anything interesting. It is funny that like Christian's image below, I am drawn to the right side sunset for a crop, though here you actually have the resolution to crop and create an interesting photo. I've highlighted an approximate area that looks very nice like a painting (there may be several possible crops and aspect ratios around this area). But for the whole work, as a composition it isn't working for me. The arc of dark bay and grass is rather boring, and the buildings along the front near us are also disappointingly boring offices. There may be some more interesting buildings further along, but they are really tiny. -- Colin (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

  Colin: I have cropped the bottom a bit --Poco² 13:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support What is interesting about this picture is the limitation to a few colours due to the reflective sunlight in the window panes and the almost identical light intensity of the street lighting. The skyline of course lacks the full moon :-) Poc The stitching ist still slightly visible.--Ermell (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

  Ermell: Stitching issues are now definitely cleaned up --Poco² 20:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support I like the way it gives a subarctic city an almost tropical feel. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too long aspect ratio and boring composition overall. - Benh (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - I agree that this is not the most picturesque view, but at full size, I like the light and detail enough to consider it worthy of a feature. I didn't expect to support until I "pixel-peeped" at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Motif and ratio are outstanding and the whole image is very interesting for me. But the horizon isn´t straight enough for a FP in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

  Milseburg: I have "fixed" the horizon in the way I imagine you expect it, but to me this kind of things are not so obvious as one could think, as the water level depends also on the distance and if there is a shore I don't expect the level to be as high as in open sea. Well, whatever, please, have a look -- Poco² 13:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support The horizon on the right side was tilted. Now it´s neraby perfect, except of the outmost end. But I want to stop niggling. Don´t cut away anything. The right part is the highlight for me. --Milseburg (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

•  Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Cutting this picture in two halves, the right part has nothing interesting and is not of good quality (see sea). The left part is ok, but is the content interesting enough for a FP ? With the whole, I'm not amazed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 01:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 10:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes