Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Humboldtbox - Berlin Cathedral.jpg

File:View from Humboldtbox - Berlin Cathedral.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2013 at 15:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View from Humboldtbox - Berlin Cathedral.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Humboldtbox - Berlin Cathedral.jpg

•  Info All by --A.Savin 15:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 15:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great detail. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 23:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good view. Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Great details; but the angle of view prevents me from inserting it as the lead picture in the article. JKadavoor Jee 04:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose While nice, colors seem too pastel due to over processing. Perspective does not correspond to the eye´s perspective, and looks artificial. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Joydeep _Talk 06:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Brilliant! --Arcalino (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JaviP96 09:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support--Mehdi^Talk 19:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support-- Magic Wizard (talk) 07:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Really don't see any problems with this. Nice picture of a historic building with an active city street scene. Daniel Case (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
•  weak oppose My first impression was: Wow, nice motive and perspective. But at the second glance I am with Tomascastelazo: I think the fassade of the building is somehow smoothed and soft. In some cases this might be a good idea but this old building needs sharpness, sharpness, sharpness and clearity on the fassade. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow.  B.p. 07:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Looks too gloomy to me; I'd prefer to see it on a brighter day. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture