Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vida no Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara.jpg

File:Vida no Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2023 at 01:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vida no Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vida no Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
•  Info created and uploaded by Nortondefeis - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support. It would be nice if the Portuguese file description included the details in the English description, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Question Can the bottom left corner be cropped? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

• That would probably put the donkey too close to the edge of the frame, perhaps tidying up the grass is an alternative? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julesvernex2 (talk • contribs)

That would, indeed. I'm going to have to  Oppose per Charles, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice composition, but sadly not the technical quality for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Lupe (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Heart-warming and appealing photo. The technical quality is OK, it has just not been treated with AI sharpening etc. --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Per Aristeas. The AI-treated images we've seen around here so far are a mixed bag: some look nice (good sharpening on subject, clean background), others are overcooked (false details on subject, waxy-looking background, sloppy transitions). This image doesn't enjoy the benefits of the former, but it avoids the issues of the latter. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  19:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral Pro for the compo and Con for the technical quality Poco a poco (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)