Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Germany Church-St-Georg-01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ulm Germany Church-St-Georg-01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2015 at 17:36:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Interior of Catholic Church St Georg in Ulm, Germany. The former garrison church was built 1902 in neogothic style.
- All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)- Support --Hubertl 19:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment Cccefalon, the dark area pointed, could you make brighter? Is barely possible to see the illustration on this area. Apart from that, congrats, nice shot. -- RTA 23:56, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Done I applied partial brightening. The challenge was, that there was not a single light switched on in the church and the corner in the eastern part of the nave was completly in the dark. When processing the image, I was afraid, that too much brightening of this part would raise too much noise, but the result now is imo acceptable. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 04:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support I already saw this in QIC and found it very nice, but I really wonder about the heavy noise level of the whole picture. Did you brighten it up a lot? Compositionally very nice of course. Maybe HDR would have been a good idea here. FP anyways, IMO. I'm really envious about your lens ;-) --Code (talk) 04:49, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment It is already a HDR image. It was really very dark in the church and I didn't wanted to go over ISO 400, so I had to expect some noise of course. The good thing was, that the problem with the TS-17mm flares is not present, when the sky is overcast or no light spots are present. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:12, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, I didn't know that. Could you eventually provide some information about your HDR processing here? The noise is quite strong IMO. I suppose you used a tripod? Why did you choose ISO 400 then? The top part is quite unsharp, too. Is this a problem of the TS-lens? --Code (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a reworked version. The noise should be substantially less. I have only the LR facility to merge HDR. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 22:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Slight oppose Great effort so far but still too noisy for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)- Oppose So sorry, but per Daniel. I think interior's bar is so high here. If I didn't look at Diliff's Poco's Code's works, my vote might be support... --Laitche (talk) 03:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Frescoes in front are not so sharp, like out of focus. Center part in too dark and crop/composition isn't so well made/chosen. --Mile (talk) 08:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support even when Diliff's and others' may be better, this one is FP level. Btw I can't see disturbing noise. --Kadellar (talk) 17:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good sharpness and interesting to see the results of a TS lens rather than stitched. I don't think we should require downsized-stitched images of interiors at FP, and this is good enough at 20MP to print flawlessly in any magazine. -- Colin (talk) 19:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 21:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Popo le Chien ouah 12:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
