Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg

File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 07:26:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info Tjörnbron (the Tjörn bridge). Tjörnbron is one of three bridges along Tjörnbroleden that connects the islands of Tjörn and Orust to the mainland. Inaugurated in 1981, the bridge was built in record time after its predecessor, the Almö Bridge, which was inaugurated in June 1960, collapsed after the bulk carrier MS Star Clipper collided with its span on 18 January 1980. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:26, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Nice image. IMO white is missing, it's a bit soft. And there are halos (from sharpening). IMO it's fixable.--XRay ^talk 08:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info Thank you for your careful review. New version uploaded based on your proposal. I also did did some local adjustment of sharpness and contrast (photo taken at the sea, and there may be water in the air and therefore a softer images .but also a very beutiful sunny autumn afternoon), and additional cleaning. I appreciate all suggestions for improvement, but please (when reviewing) also remember that it is a uncompressed wide angle image of a very large object. The images is taken with a very sharp prime lens to get the best possible result. Regards--ArildV (talk) 09:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Very good, but there's a big dust spot in the sky. --Code (talk) 11:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

   Done Thank you Code--ArildV (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support now. --Code (talk) 07:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment A bit too dark perhaps? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

   Done Thank you--ArildV (talk) 06:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

  I think it can also be a bit more contrasty. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

   Done--ArildV (talk) 06:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

   Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

• Weak  Oppose The subject has wow potential but the result is not at FP level to me. The left crop is not convincing and the top crop too tight. Furthermore this kind of pictures demand IMO perspective feeling and the square-like format is not helping for this purpose. Looking into a map it looks like it is possible to get a bit further and capture more on the left, or even create a pano out of several frames Poco² 08:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment It was not possible to get a bit further back, it is cliffs and if you go further back you start to climb down. If you go to the left, you will get a very boring car park instead of the sea and get a very boring images. The composition is carefully choiced in order to get the best composition with both the bridge and the sea below. Its not a square-like format, its standard 6x4.--ArildV (talk) 08:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

  Ok, thanks for the feedback I believe you, and understand now that there were not so many options, but sorry Arild, I am not convinced about the result Poco² 09:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose The brightened version is far much better, however the square-like format and the cut part at left don't help. -- Christian Ferrer 16:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC) User "spoiled their ballot" by supporting 90 consecutive nominations, for which they got blocked. Per discussion on ArildV talk. Let's have this image promoted because the community agree it deserves it, not because of a disruptive user playing games. -- Colin (talk) 14:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 09:08, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Good quality and nice lighting but need more air on the top and the left, I can't breathe... --Laitche (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It is a bit soft. Don't mind the left crop as it is very hard to get all of a bridge in the frame. Nice light. -- Colin (talk) 12:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support The space at top is a bit short. If it could be cloned, then great. Yann (talk) 23:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 17:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges