Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tent rocks MG 3174.jpg

File:Tent rocks MG 3174.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2009 at 15:12:32

•  Info created by JuliusR - uploaded by JuliusR - nominated by JuliusR -- JuliusR (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- JuliusR (talk) 15:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunate blown highlight (almost 28,000 pixels are pure white (RGB 255,255,255)) and insufficient DOF. Lycaon (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose the blown highlights hold a commanding position in the photo and draw the eye staright to them, can you retake without as it is a really strong composition. Gnangarra 15:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Musia! (talk) 18:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I would like to support this picture, but the full white needs correcting. It should be possible with any good photo software to either do a manual touch-up, or to cpoy from another take of this subject. I have found that this saturation is one of the drawbacks of the JPEG compression which is standard in digital cameras. I ahve also found that my older camera generally will either give you a good rendering of most of the picture with a saturated white area, or detail in the highlight but the rest of the picture looks a bit too dark and sombre. Nice photo. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 20:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like it, but still per Lycaon. —kallerna™ 20:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The overexposure is a pity, otherwise -nice- --Richard Bartz (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 21:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Avjoska (talk) 10:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 10:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)