Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum fonscolombii, female, Sète cf06.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sympetrum fonscolombii, female, Sète cf06.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2016 at 07:38:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
- Info All by -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem (talk) 11:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Dragonflies do push-ups??? O_o w.carter-Talk 15:54, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Jee 16:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful picture. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:44, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral - I don't find the composition as a whole compelling, maybe partly because the bokeh that takes up so much of the picture frame is dull and pretty much just sits there. However, you deserve kudos for focusing on one of the compound eyes. We don't often see that in dragonfly pictures at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support although I would have cropped in more. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 21:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support FP, but is this better than file:Darter August 2007-22 edit.jpg by @Alvesgaspar: ? I can't find an FP policy on having multiple FPs of the same species from the same angle (dorsal/ventral/lateral). Charles (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Can't we have multiple FPs of the same thing? I've never heard anything about that. Anyway, the file:Darter August 2007-22 edit.jpg is an FP on the English and Croatian Wikipedia, not the Commons. --w.carter-Talk 22:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sure we can. This isn't Valued Images --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- It is only a 1.7 MP which may be good per that day's standard; but not of now. Jee 03:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support Great picture, great foreground and great background--Lmbuga (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata