Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg

File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2018 at 03:49:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swing into books, Book week, November 1-7, 1964.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info created by Bruno Munari - uploaded by Moheen Reeyad - nominated by Moheen Reeyad -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:49, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The industrial typography spoils the drawing. A manual calligraphy for these two lines of text would have made it more special -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it. The combination does not bother me. :)--Peulle (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per Peulle. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I like it too; however I've tagged it as being better in .PNG format. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

• Disagree. The original file seems to be a lithograph, and the details of the ink spread on the paper are visible at full size. Changing this JPG into a PNG will result in a loss of quality. Daniel Case better to remove your template IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

If others agree, I will. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

I've amended my comment, which was supposing this lithograph shot by a camera as we usually do for paintings. PNGs are well adapted to vector graphics, and this piece of art is made of irregular solid pigments. Every lithograph is unique, see for example 2 similar lithographs by Kandinsky 1 and 2 that slightly differ to each other. But this image also may come from a scan, so yes, in that case PNG will be better. Sorry, no problem with the template anymore -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Question Sorry, what about the copyright, as the author died in 1998 ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

@Jebulon: It was published without a copyright notice; at that time that puts it in the public domain now ... I think.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media