Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunset at Land's end in San Francisco.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sunset at Land's end in San Francisco.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2009 at 14:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 14:34, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose there's no trait in this picture that would make it better than thousands of similar sunset photos. --Leafnode 14:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I've nominated a similar image File:Sunset from Sutro Bath in San Francisco.jpg on QI and user Ischa1 commented on it like that: "It is one of the best sunset pictures I've ever seen! NICE!" Of course after that comment I became so proud of myself that I've decided to nominate one on FP too :)--Mbz1 (talk) 16:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- QI != FP ;) But keep up the good work - I really enjoy looking at your photos. --Leafnode 16:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! (Don't listen to critics, go on with your wonderful pictures). Yann (talk) 21:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Love the mood and colors. /Daniel78 (talk) 22:45, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support A worthy sunset image--almost a painting! --JalalV (talk) 01:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support For Yann and JalalV. Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support - An excellent picture of a sunset. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:20, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support "Just another sunset really" :) --Herby talk thyme 11:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support--663h (talk) 11:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp. —kallerna™ 11:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- What a great observation - a long time exposure ot the clouds and the waves is unsharp :)--Mbz1 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
- Rocks are unsharp too. They wouldn't be moving throughout the exposure. Flying Freddy (talk) 10:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- If Freddy could fly, surely rocks could move too --Mbz1 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Rocks are unsharp too. They wouldn't be moving throughout the exposure. Flying Freddy (talk) 10:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support This is really an outstanding piece of art in my opinion. --Korall (talk) 14:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Big wow mitigates quality issues IMO --S23678 (talk) 01:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Berthold Werner (talk) 16:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena