Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Squirrelmonkfamily1.jpg

File:Squirrelmonkfamily1.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 8 Aug 2009 at 08:34:22

•  Info created by julielangford - uploaded by julielangford - nominated by julielangford -- Julielangford (talk) 08:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Julielangford (talk) 08:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I recommend geolocating it on the file page. --Slaunger (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
  • And also please mention the zoo by name where it was taken in the file page description. It is rather important to know if such photos are zoo shots or not. --Slaunger (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad quality - the face of the monkey on the left.--Two+two=4 (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Two+two=4, also quite noisy. -- JovanCormac (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Question The quality seems great, apart from that left monkey's face. What happened? Why just there? Maedin\^talk 18:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I think i have uploaded the wrong file by the looks of it. This is one that I have edited. I will swap it over for the right file now. --Julielangford (talk) 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely! Yann (talk) 09:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it is very good photo, and had it been from the wild in its natural environment, I would have supported. The slight quality problems on the face of one monkey (I did not see any significant imprevement in the new revision of the image) and the cutoff tail makes me conclude that it is not quite on par with what I expect from a featured picture. --Slaunger (talk) 10:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Slaunger. —kallerna™ 15:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise and blur are too bad to ignore. -- JovanCormac 17:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Voted twice by accident. -- JovanCormac 06:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, Ok, I got you the first time, you oppose, that's fine, but could you possibly keep it to the once please. Julielangford (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, any user can vote once, if they like. If what you are really saying is that you got the point and would like to withdraw your nomination you can add

{{withdraw|~~~~}}

to this nomination page - and the reviews will stop. --Slaunger (talk) 22:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

The user ment that JovanCormac opposed the image 2 times.--Two+two=4 (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm really sorry about that, just realized it ;-) I scratched out the second one. Apologies in particular to the nominator, I meant no disrespect. -- JovanCormac 06:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

And sorry for overlooking that one user had indeed voted twice - I misunderstood your comment, Julie. --Slaunger (talk) 21:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

•  Support The quality on the left monkey isn't so good, but I think the right monkey and her baby more than make up for that. Maedin\^talk 07:24, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - right side fine, left side just not interesting enough Downtowngal (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, Tintero (talk) 19:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Yann (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)