Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spring St Station.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Spring St Station.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2009 at 13:57:21
- Info created by Anh Dinh - uploaded by Magicknight94 - nominated by Magicknight94 -- Lê (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Lê (talk) 13:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Very bad quality. Nothing is sharp. Strong pixelization all over the image.--Two+two=4 (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Weak Support the quality is not terrible, and it certainly shouldn't be FPXed. I don't have a particularly strong opinion on this picture, I just feel that the voting should be allowed to continue. -- TonyBallioni (talk) 00:19, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Now I understand why you opposed few of my images --Two+two=4 (talk) 00:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- To be honest, most (if not all) of your pictures are of better quality than this, but most of the ones I've voted on are also of human subjects, which I have higher standards for. I probably would have been neutral on this image if it weren't for the FPX, its just there is something I find intriguing about this image, and I believe that it deserves a vote. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Now I understand why you opposed few of my images --Two+two=4 (talk) 00:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose The 16x16 light/dark blocks are very distracting - almost looks like a corrupt JPEG. Apart from that, there are JPEG artifacts everywhere and what I assume are bits of dust (though it's hard to be sure with that much compression). Time3000 (talk) 08:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I expect a lot more quality from a picture taken in 2009. -- Korall (talk) 09:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality. —kallerna™ 16:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose You can't be serious, looks like a snapshot from a 1980's CCTV. -- H005 (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Very bad quality, very blurry! -- Ymaup (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Because of quality. A bit too artsy for my taste as well. -- JovanCormac 14:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results: