Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spectroscopy overview.svg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Spectroscopy overview.svg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2011 at 19:51:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info Created and nominated by Jon C -- Original illustration with annotations. Jon C (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Jon C (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Snaevar (talk) 15:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Specific sized SVGs seem to be having problems, or at least for this image. Still conditional support if whatever this is is scientifically accurate (and if anyone would like to give me or link me to a lesson about this, lazers? I might read it. :) --IdLoveOne (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi IdLoveOne - can you tell me what you mean by "specific sized SVG"? I've been troubleshooting SVGs - there are loads of oddities with the thumbnail/rendering of MediaSVG. The image is scientifically accurate (I teach spectroscopy :) ) If you visit the image page on the Commons, the annotations and image notes should guide you to some readings. The idea was/is to create a network of scientific illustrations in the same style (e.g., see this) so readers can intuitively compare concepts; each image would be annotate and linked to one another so readers can go onto what they're interested in. Jon C (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- I don't know I was getting some kind of SVG error page.. -shrug- Thanks. --IdLoveOne (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Hi IdLoveOne - can you tell me what you mean by "specific sized SVG"? I've been troubleshooting SVGs - there are loads of oddities with the thumbnail/rendering of MediaSVG. The image is scientifically accurate (I teach spectroscopy :) ) If you visit the image page on the Commons, the annotations and image notes should guide you to some readings. The idea was/is to create a network of scientific illustrations in the same style (e.g., see this) so readers can intuitively compare concepts; each image would be annotate and linked to one another so readers can go onto what they're interested in. Jon C (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)