Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spb 06-2017 img47 Church on the Blood.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Spb 06-2017 img47 Church on the Blood.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2017 at 08:58:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info Bird's eye-view of Church of the Savior on Blood and Griboyedov Canal in Saint Petersburg, Russia - all by A.Savin --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 08:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The overall tone is too grey-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 09:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I think this should be rotated into portrait. Perhaps anticlock. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support for the general composition.--Peulle (talk) 09:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Capricorn4049 (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Great image. Birds' eye views are always awesome to look at, even if (according to a photographer I was chatting with the other day) they're often judged as a fad in more "serious" photo competitions. -- Thennicke (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, good job. --Selbymay (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Quite visually arresting. But I wonder whether it would look better with a bit of noise reduction. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I did my usual portion (for Phantom always more than for DSLR) in Lightroom. Some remaining noise in darker areas is inevitable, but I'm eagerly awaiting a Phantom with more megapixels, less noise, and not much more weight and price... )) --A.Savin 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Unsual view and it works. --C messier (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support Because it looks like some kind of weird steampunk machinery. :) --cart-Talk 18:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support per cart. It has the technical shortcomings of most drone pictures, but it's an arresting view that only the drone could have gotten. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- Colin (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Support --fedaro (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings