Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spb 06-2012 University Embankment 01.jpg

File:Spb 06-2012 University Embankment 01.jpg, withdrawn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2013 at 13:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Spb 06-2012 University Embankment 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spb 06-2012 University Embankment 01.jpg

3883

1038

271

407

4162

2395

Main University bulding facade (Too tight crop)

•  Info All by A.Savin. The image shows the most prominent part of the University Embankment (with some historical buildings of the Spb State University) in Saint Petersburg, Russia, as seen from the St. Isaac's Cathedral, during a changeable weather. Barely not enough participants in the previous FPC - however, I still find the overall atmosphere nice and dramatic, so I'm going to try again.
•  Support --A.Savin 13:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The proportions are off, too much foilage; vehicles, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Question Not happy with the "cut" buildings on left and right. Just noticed at least one building is being "cut" on all versions. May be a stitched version possible? JKadavoor Jee 16:42, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose foreground and trees disturbing, prefer also a stitched version as jkadavoor -- Arcalino (talk) 17:56, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm as much a fan of high-resolution stitched panoramas as the next person, but the lighting and weather conditions here are special and (I assume) not easily repeated. A vertical crop 1550px down from the top removes the distracting foreground and creates an interesting panoramic image imo, even if it isn't super high resolution. Colin (talk) 19:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice combination of the trees, water, scenic sky and buldings line, of course (facades weren't cut off). Thees on foreground does'nt cause any irritation. Strange complaints for this picture anyway. --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 20:48, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose with reasons: 1. Strong Oversaturated 2. Too tight crop (See notes). 3.Unbalanced compoisition, too much foreground. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per George Chernilevsky --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose par --Djhé (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 10:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)