Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silhuetas no Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra (cropped).jpg

File:Silhuetas no Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra (cropped).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2023 at 17:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Silhuetas no Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra (cropped).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silhuetas no Forte de Santo Antônio da Barra (cropped).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Brazil
•  Info Silhouettes at the Fort of Santo Antônio da Barra, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. It was constructed to guard the entrance to the Bay of All Saints, during the time of the Portuguese Empire. Created and initially uploaded by Railson Nascimento - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support This mood just wowed me. -- ★ 17:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 18:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I have a preference for the original. Would you be willing to offer it as an alt? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

  The original has some stitching errors. ★ 00:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

• I hadn't noticed or checked for those, but compositionally, it breathes more. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose I simply find the composition of this cropped image very disappointing compared to the original. It's in-your-face and doesn't breathe. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--Princess 🍵 Rosalina 14711 00:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I was going to support, but looking at the original I'm not sure what's going on. The photo is less than the maximum resolution of the camera, so I don't assume they'd be stitching errors (though it's possible, of course). That makes me wonder what other kinds of manipulations might have caused those effects... — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

  Yes, but the cropped version hasn’t stitching erros and the resolution is totally acceptable for FP. ★ 13:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --XRay 💬 16:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Going forth and back on this one, I think it’s original enough to deserve a star. (The uncropped version would be much more balanced, of course, but the problems are too obvious.) --Aristeas (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I feel like the stitching errors should have been dealt with in the full composition. I don't understand why this crop deserves a star, but obviously, a strong consensus disagrees with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

  The consensus seems to realize that the crop also harmonizes with the diagonal composition. ★ 11:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

You're the only one to mention this, so you seem to be putting words in people's mouths. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

I said "seems", so it's just a perception. ★ 16:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Laitche (talk) 04:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Brazil