Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seljalandsfoss, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 189-191 HDR.JPG

File:Seljalandsfoss, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 189-191 HDR.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2015 at 20:36:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Seljalandsfoss, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 189-191 HDR.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seljalandsfoss, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 189-191 HDR.JPG

•  Info Sunset side view of the Seljalandsfoss waterfall, Suðurland, Iceland. The waterfall of the river Seljalandsá drops 60 metres (200 ft) over the cliffs of the former coastline. All by me, Poco² 20:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 20:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Question Just curious... Where did that shiny thing in the middle came from? Looks quite unnatural and unnecessary. Probably would look better without it. -- Pofka (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Compositionally it's very nice (would have been even nice to see the edges of the pool though), but the processing is a bit off-putting. The edge where the sky and cliffs meet has a strong halo. It's more obvious in the thumbnail view than at full size, but it's still not ideal. Diliff (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

  Diliff, Pofka: Better? Poco² 20:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support now. That shiny thing was completely unnecessary for sure! -- Pofka (talk) 21:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
• Poco, there doesn't seem to be any change to the halo that I mentioned.... Diliff (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

• Looking at it again, it could actually be brighter next to the cliff because the waterfall's path creates a small gap between it and the cliff, so perhaps it's not a halo. Diliff (talk) 22:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I loved the sharpening and the composition, a litle bridge there with this bigest fall. Simply overwhelming --The_Photographer (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I'm sooo envious. Really. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Kikos (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support –Makele-90 (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 19:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. I'm "wowed". 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a fan of the composition which is mostly centered on the waterfall itself. Would have preferred something wider and dramatic. Like in [1], [2] or [3]. Don't know what combination of lens and filter was used but it looks a bit soft for a tripod shot photo. - Benh (talk) 09:15, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I have to admit, I would also prefer to see these compositions, particularly the third one which has a similar 'under the waterfall' angle, but with a more interesting and aesthetic composition, and better lighting. Diliff (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I have no problems with this. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Successful posing in creating flow transparency on clouds. Zcebeci (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Trace (talk) 21:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 10:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 18:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --///EuroCarGT 03:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:41, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena