Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Veitshöchheim, 10.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Schloss Veitshöchheim, 10.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2010 at 17:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Rainer Lippert - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by Rainer Lippert
- Info The castle Veitshöchheim is a former summer residence of the Prince-bishops of Würzburg, and later the kings of Bavaria, in Veitshöchheim, Germany.
- Abstain -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I think this is a nice picture with good quality,
but the stairs have been a bit distorted by the stitching program, which looks real strange in 100% view. Do you think this could be fixed?Nikopol (talk) 23:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)- Hallo, meinst du das geschwungene in der Treppe? Die Treppe ist in der Realität auch etwas geschwungen. Das liegt nicht am stitchen. Siehe dazu das verwendete Einzelbild. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- You are right, it is indeed not at all produced by stitching! I am sorry, I just couldn´t imagine it´s like that in reality ;) Nikopol (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Alles klar, kein Problem. Es handelt sich um insgesamt drei Bilder, die beiden Nahtstellen sind aber weiter außen. Grüße -- Rainer Lippert (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Simonizer (talk) 21:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I would have supported if the light had been better. I find the light too flat, I'm afraid. Otherwise, a very nice building and good, overall quality and value. --Slaunger (talk) 23:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Slaunger - colours and lightning. —kallerna™ 11:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality, but poor lightning conditions --S23678 (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I'm removing this speedy. The nominator did not support, so the second support from Simonizer is independent. I will write a message at the FPCbot page. --99of9 (talk) 01:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)