Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2016 at 17:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sant'Andrea (Mantua) - Dome.jpg


Personal argument about an unwelcome vote
* Comment I was sure you'd say that Jebulon, unfortunately (as you can see here [1]) I can not take a picture with a perfect center because there is a fence, thanks--LivioAndronico (talk) 23:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Of course, I'm sure there is a good reason for that non-centered image. But not every place is worth a picture, and not every place is worth a Featured Picture.--Jebulon (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment Sure Jebulon but we do not change the subject, what you said? It is not centered ... and I responded to that. Then you should upgrade your opposition to what you really believe and not just "is not centered". Everything else is subjective and surely you would not have responded if I had just written to me (which you did not) I do not like etc.. thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 11:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Another personal argument about an unwelcome vote
:Surprise...a your negative vote. Strange for the Centered Featured pictures. Trust me the point is just another --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop focusing on others' opposes behaviour. - Benh (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with the opposes I have problems with those who invent the things. When you end I'll finish.--LivioAndronico (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


One more personal argument about an unwelcome vote
:Sure,sure...--LivioAndronico (talk) 13:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You don’t need to argue. By nominating, you virtually asked me for my opinion about the image, and there it is. Try to say thanks. And pleeeeease try not to take any oppose as a personal insult. --Kreuzschnabel 06:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You must be more calm, I ask an opinion but possibly objective and unspoken things at raaaaaaaaaaaaaaandom. I insulted you? just that you say it is false --LivioAndronico (talk) 12:13, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You dind’t at all insult me, and I assure you it takes much more to upset me. I just wonder why you – please excuse for my choice of words – seem to feel so pissed off any time someone opposes your nominations. Nobody else in here behaves that way (except Spurzem from time to time). If you plan to keep others from opposing: Won’t work at all. --Kreuzschnabel 21:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not want to upset you and do not care. Simply you tell falsehoods, the others, in fact, do not share. That's all. p.s. Spurzem is a good guy--LivioAndronico (talk) 21:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure he’s a good guy, I never said nor meant he wasn’t. He just shares your habit of going spare on any opposing vote. And I am expressing my personal opinion, which is just an opinion. Please keep from tagging it as "false", since your personal taste is not a general standard of wrong or right. It would be false if I wrote things I do not really think, but I don’t. --Kreuzschnabel 12:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If a photo is "certainly overprocessed" isn't a opinion but you say it as if it were a certainty....but is false! --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please do us all a favour and look up the meaning of to me in your favourite dictionary. Thank you. --Kreuzschnabel 21:42, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Surely after that you will do a favor to all and you will find your vocabulary the term objective. Thanks. --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment You asked for an example of inappropriate behavior by you? This subthread is an obvious one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure and you tell me Ikan Kekek how many people approve this comment? You know how many times I've had comments so always false by the same people? This photo is definitely overprocessed? Ok Since it is "safe" why nobody approve? But please .... seriously!--LivioAndronico (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have no interest in debating minutiae with you. I merely observe that your behavior is bad, and if you want me to, I will point out every time you engage in behavior I consider bad, and that would cause you to be suspended if you did it on Wikivoyage. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not care your opinion, here we are on the commons, for me the way you do it is painful, we have to do? Differences of thought! If you haven't interest,don't do...simple --LivioAndronico (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Sant%27Andrea_(Mantua)_-_Dome.jpg&oldid=202856327"