Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saarbrücken Hafenstraße.jpg

File:Saarbrücken Hafenstraße.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2011 at 10:09:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saarbrücken Hafenstraße.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saarbrücken Hafenstraße.jpg

683

921

76

551

4288

2848

chromatic aberrations

3633

494

237

759

4288

2848

CA's

1233

1130

76

142

4288

2848

CA's

•  Info created by Wolfgang Staudt - uploaded & nominated by Originalwana (talk) 10:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support As nominator Originalwana (talk) 10:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per unnatural coloring. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural coloring. chromatic aberrations (see note). Noise--Miguel Bugallo 21:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unnatural coloring. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 22:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Aktron (talk) 10:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 11:57, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Lmbuga. (lot of CA both sides)--Jebulon (talk) 13:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I actually really like the colors. TFCforever (talk) 18:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose unnatural colours, and 1:1 symmetry (as opposed to rule of thirds) makes it unappealing to me. --ELEKHH^T 08:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

The rule of thirds, the normative of thirds, the legislation of thirds, the dogma of thirds. OMG, who taught these kids photography? Rule of thirds is a guideline that enhances the composition of photos in many case. It is not a must have for a picture to be excellent. This picture is not good anyways but let's not have square heads with the rule of thirds. Mirror symmetries, patterns, ... are also, together with rule of thirds, some of the many structural displays that make a composition appealing. Downsampledbokeh (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose coloring is good, but it is too noisy --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --SHION (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Account age too young, and number of edits too low.--Snaevar (talk) 13:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose too much noise in the sky, too much ca and i don't like these colours --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)