Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF B 81500 Embrun - Montdauphin-Guillestre.jpg

File:SNCF B 81500 Embrun - Montdauphin-Guillestre.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2022 at 18:59:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF B 81500 Embrun - Montdauphin-Guillestre.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SNCF B 81500 Embrun - Montdauphin-Guillestre.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes
•  Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support – Ivar (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The train (with six engines?) is small but it's an attractive scene. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support One of those photos with which I want to decorate a wall in my bedroom. Amazing view. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per others. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 21:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Nice view where the train is of course a main element, giving life to the landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful landscape image. Have tried to add some categories for the landscape; further improvements are very welcome ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Striking composition and colours. --Tagooty (talk) 07:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry to dissent. The train is only so big here, and the landscape itself is not extraordinary, with a very uniform light (which I usually forgive because of the otherwise excellent timing) and I think I could be taken at a better time of the year. I'd like either more snow or more leaves, but not patches of snow and bare trees. - Benh (talk) 11:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:38, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Very attractive! --SHB2000 (talk)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much unsharpness. And you don't see the train until you look closely or at full size. Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose, in part per Daniel and Benh. Beautiful scene but not as sharp as usual and the composition is fine but not exceptional to me. The size of the train relative to the picture frame doesn't matter to me, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Good, but not outstanding for me. --El Grafo (talk) 07:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Hautes-Alpes